The West's Ageing Population - what can we do about it?
"The changing age structure of New Zealand’s population is inextricably linked with
a projected decrease in births and a projected increase in deaths. Births exceeded
deaths by about 30,000 in 2005 (June year), but deaths are projected to outnumber
births from the early 2040s."
the stats keep coming:
"The 65+ age group is projected to make up over one-quarter of New Zealand’s
population from the late 2030s"
and this, also chilling:
"The 65+ age group is projected to make up over one-quarter of New Zealand’s
population from the late 2030s, compared with 12 percent in 2005." (find the info here)
BBC News enlightens us to the never-before-seen situation in Italy (the vanguard of birth control and abortion, it would seem..)
"By mid-century there may be one pensioner for every one productive worker in Italy, which begs a simple, devastating question: how on earth is Italy going to maintain its pensions system?"
"...When will Europeans wake up to the implications of consistently low birth rates? Well, in the words of one European professor of population studies, probably not until they are all in their wheelchairs and they suddenly realise there is no one left to push." (read the whole article here)
Labels: abortion, economics, multi-nationalism, population
2 Comments:
Does this not concern you? http://www.history.com/topics/overpopulation
Overpopulation will kill the worlds populations if we don't do something about it now..
Hi there, thanks for the comment.
These questions are huge, and I'm definitely not saying I understand them or have the answers. I do know, however, that killing children is not solving any problem the world has, rather it is creating new difficulties - both of the impact on women and on the economies of nations.
When you say 'the world's populations' - I take it you're referring to the increase in poverty 'over population' creates in third world, rather than Western countries. Western countries do not have a problem with over population - the reverse is true.
If anything, these countries desperately need more young people.
The problem of 'over population' in third world countries is due to the fact of unequal wealth distribution, rather than too many people. If these poor people had the money to start, and keep their own farms for instance, there would be more than enough work to go around.
A smaller population in third world countries wouldn't solve the problem of poverty.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home